« Previous   Next »

Recent Blogs

Monday, September 8th, 2008
McCain 54%, Obama 44%

This according to a USA Today polling of Likely Voters, released yesterday.

Now, this isn't the time for the McCainiacs to celebrate, nor the Obamians to panic.

Why?

Because Bush led Kerry in the same week of polling 4 years ago by a margin of 54-38, and we all know he won that election by the skin of his teeth. This thing is far from settled. Not to mention, there is still some post-convention bump built in to that polling.

One comfort for the GOP is that Bush got his lunch handed to him in 2 of the 3 debates, which accounts for the loss of his lead. I expect McCain to perform much better against Obama than Bush vs. Kerry.

The polling reveals for the first time McCain is in front. We should see some state polling this week to indicate how this difference might play out in IA, PA, MI, OH, NM, CO, NV, NH, and VA.

Why is McCain/Palin winning right now? I think the answer is because they have the edge on "we hate Republican (and governmental) corruption more than you do." That's what this election is all about. If Obama can turn the tide in that department, he can still win this thing handily.

Reminders: Obama on O'Reilly the next 3 nights, and Palin to talk to Charlie Gibson later this week (date has not been released?)

53 Comments
dennydeaton
1) Brian,
Are these pre-CHAD stats or should we expect some fudging later on?

Interesting breakdown of historical debate results and overall election outcome for sure. I can't wait for the debates, that's when it gets good.
Denny Deaton   Monday, September 8, 2008
soundchick
2) I don't really put much stock in polls. They are too easily manipulated by the pollers and the pollees. (Not sure if either one of those are real words.)
soundchick   Monday, September 8, 2008
ppike
3) The Republican ticket has the edge on "we hate Republican corruption more than you do" -- and it works. Holy moly, that's crazy.
pegi   Monday, September 8, 2008
spike
4) that is crazy
Spike   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
5) If there's anybody who can turn around the 'Republican corruption,' it's an old white dude who has been in Washington for decades, hires lobbyists for his campaign and votes with George Bush 90% of the time. McCain really has a monopoly on this whole 'change' thing.
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
6) A couple of things to note:

1. I agree that polls at this stage should not be taken as gospel.

2. However,based on history the fact that the economy is not doing well would suggest a landslide victory for the party not in office. The GOP has to take the fact that they are not getting crushed right now as a positive sign.

3. I think Palin is directly responsible for this latest rise for McCain. She has been able to get the conservative base out. In the 2006 elections which the dems won, the republican base stayed home.

4. I think that McCain needs to continue to campaign on core conservative values in order to keep the base energized. If he starts to pass the olive branch, he would do so at his own peril.

5. It is still a little too early to tell if Palin is the real deal or not. However, based on her appearance at the GOP convention, she doesnt look like someone who can be bullied around. Biden had better be very careful at the vp debates.

6. But again, why hasnt Obama been able to close the deal? Are people just enthused at Palin/McCain or are they apprehensive about Obama?
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
7) Crazy, but true- and probably no one else but McCain/Palin could have pulled it off- almost everyone else just looks like an establishment Republican. I'm telling you, Palin taking on her own party is playing well with independents, it seems. But you all are right, it's still very early. McCain could just as easily lose by 10 points as he could keep this lead.

Note to Obama: trying to cast this as Bush's third term isn't working. I don't know what Obama should do, but that isn't meaningful to anyone but his most diehard loyalists. Obama is saying that McCain voted with Bush "90% of the time," but what that doesn't reveal is that many Senate votes are unanimous or nearly so (stuff like, a resolution to honor the Olympians, or the retiring Senate clerk, etc.). Obama himself has probably voted with Bush 70% of the time, or more. I'm hoping someone will do the math on that one.
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
8) Dave,

How often has Obama voted with Ted Kennedy? Obama was voted the most liberal Senator. Where has he crossed over to help bring this country together?

Do you want more of Ted Kennedy's socialist ideas implemented? If yes, then vote for Obama.
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
9) So now we should oppose people because they are "old and white." Nice.

No one said McCain had a monopoly, just a significant advantage- at least in perception, if not, in fact.
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
10) What deal has Obama not closed? He won the nomination. We have not held the election yet. Please tell me when any Presidential election was closed in September.

Brian I never said that we should not vote for old white people - please don't put words in my mouth. My point was that McCain is like every politician we've ever had, especially in recent memory. Him being old and white is just another similarity he shares with the current administration.

I also strongly disagree that McCain has a "significant advantage" of the notion of change. Almost nothing he has proposed has been a significant change (let's not forget he has avoided almost any actual specifics on what he will do if he wins).

Obama's campaign was the one that first and best promoted change. Once he started winning votes, the other candidates jumped on the change bandwagon.
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
11) Ok, maybe the term "closing the deal" is a bit overused. I will lay it out in plain language.

Obama should have at least a 15-20 point lead right now. If you look at historical data, the party in charge when the economy is not doing well, gets crushed.

Obama had a lead and is watching it slip away to nothing. Why is that? Why cant he capitalize on all the media attention he is receiving? The GOP for all intents and purposes was dead after 2006. Every pundant would have told you 3 months ago that Obama wins big in a landslide. Why isnt that happening?

Is it because of hidden racism? Is it because the GOP is now rejuvenated? Or is it because Obama keeps saying the same things over and over and over again.

I think it is because the American people have heard enough about the general concept of "Change" now they want to know "How we will change". I dont think Obama has delivered that message as of yet.
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
12) Rick, good point. Kennedy would be much more change than McCain. I would totally jump on a Kennedy ticket if it was available.
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
13) Rick, if you value polls that much, there's really no point debating this. Polls are historically inaccurate.
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
14) Dave,

I dont value polls that much as I stated earlier. But I think they can give you a sense of what is going on.

Obama is a political strategist's wet dream:

1. He is a rock star
2. He has raised hundres of millions of dollars
3. He gets tons of free media exposure (ie. the Oprah show)
4.The economy is down and he is in the oppossing party.
5. He is young and good looking.
6. His opponent is a long time Washington insider and old.
7. More people voted in the democratic primaries than in the republican.
8. His opponent kept his word and accepted public campaign dollars and is thus limited to that amount. Obama has a huge cash advantage.

I mean based on all of the above points, Obama isnt getting it done. Now the question is why not? Is there something wrong with him or his message? He definitely needs to do something to stop the leakage.


Regarding your support for Ted Kennedy, I just think that is one of those fundamental issues where we disagree. I cannot support an old rich guy who thinks he knows better than the average American and who runs from trouble.
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
15) But Dave- you are saying him being old and white is relevant somehow. I just don't see it. I've known too many old white guys I think the world of. Why can't we just leave that out of the discussion? You are making it an issue, not me.

McCain like every other politician we've ever had? Ask Rick Santorum what he thinks about that.

Obama's "change" motif was very effective in taking on Hillary. It weakened when he added Biden, and even more so when McCain's Maverick mentality became more emphasized (who he has been almost his entire Senate career). It's not jumping on the bandwagon. It is speaking of an actual strength he has possessed for some time.

But let me assume you are right. How can you explain McCain's lead in the polls? What in your view, is McCain doing well, or Obama failing to do? I'm all ears.
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
16) I don't value polls, so I am not going to speculate on their results.

Brian, since you lumped all black people under the "will most likely vote for Obama because he's black" umbrella, I think you better than anyone would see the connection between old white guys and Washington.

I also do not agree that Obama is not "getting it done." I think he's doing a remarkable job.

Rick, you listed a ton of reasons that Obama stands a fighting chance, and I agree with them all.

Polls aside, this election will come down to a very small group of people. Long-time democrats will probably vote for Obama, and long-time Republicans will probably vote for McCain. Independents will be the factor, but I think more specifically, independents in swing states are really the group that will decide this election. Ohio, Florida, Michigan - these are states that matter.

So with that respect, Rick and my votes are irrelevant. But Brian, you're in a good position. Maybe I should consider moving to another state...
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
jason
17) "This according to a USA Today polling of Likely Voters, released yesterday." -per Brian's original post.

What exactly does "...Likely Voters" mean?
jason   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
18) Good points Dave.

Although McCain is leading in National Polls, Obama is still ahead in the electoral college. McCain is going to have to win some tough swing states. I think he will win Florida but Ohio, Michigan, and Colorado could easily go Obama.
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
talkswithstrangers
19) "What exactly does "...Likely Voters" mean?"

people who aren't on caging lists ;-)
talkswithstrangers   Monday, September 8, 2008
hawkwolf
20) I refuse to get into this conversation; however, I will say that there are some very comments.
BeanCounter37   Monday, September 8, 2008
markhamrick
21) Jason - typically polls have a screening question where they ask a registered voter's likelihood to vote. Those who don't say they are definitely voting or very likely to vote are usually screened out. I guess it gauges the hard core voters, but doesn't quite account for the people leaning on the fence (which probably lean towards Obama this year).
Mark   Monday, September 8, 2008
markhamrick
22) I agree that there are some very comments!
Mark   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
23) It's exhausting arguing this stuff with you, Rick and Brian. But I do like you guys, despite our obvious fundamental differences. This election is going to be super awesome. I'm totally looking forward to the next couple of months.
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
soundchick
24) I'm looking forward to it being over! Or at least some debates between the candidates. Does anyone know if any are scheduled?
soundchick   Monday, September 8, 2008
Scott
25) I think this election is going to draw a lot of "unlikely voters", so who knows what polls will tell us.
Scott   Monday, September 8, 2008
spike
26) these comments are very very very
Spike   Monday, September 8, 2008
rangywulf
27) I think the first debate is in the first week of October. I could be totally wrong about that though...

I also agree that these comments are very very very very...
RW   Monday, September 8, 2008
nheinzel
28) And the Gallup Poll today says McCain 48%, Obama 45%. So much for polls....

As for the country, I think we're pretty much 50/50 red/blue, conservative/liberal as evidenced by the Gore/Bush election fiasco. I think that's the only explanation of why our country is in a war hated by many and our economy is going in the toilet and still the party in power is not way behind in the polls.
!   Monday, September 8, 2008
29) obama is doing a shit job on explaining the tax issue. although, i believe his message is clear, McCain keeps pounding that Obama will raise taxes for anyone making over 42K a year - even fox news has debunked this. It's that simple. we're in a recession and people can't put food on the table or make their mortgage. they're gonna vote for the guy who won't raise their taxes.

I would like to hear from the women on this site that support McCain. How can you support a man who does not believe in equal pay for women? How do you justify your vote?
obamabot   Monday, September 8, 2008
dazedpink
30) Debate schedule:

September 26, 2008: Presidential debate with domestic policy focus, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS

October 2, 2008: Vice Presidential debate, Washington University, St. Louis, MO

October 7, 2008: Presidential debate in a town hall format, Belmont University, Nashville, TN

October 15, 2008:Presidential debate with foreign policy focus, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY
Jules   Monday, September 8, 2008
rangywulf
31) Jules, thanks for the schedule!
RW   Monday, September 8, 2008
nheinzel
32) A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll just released says Obama 48%, McCain 48%, 3% undecided. I guess the other one percent were comatose.
!   Monday, September 8, 2008
dennydeaton
33) At this point I would have expected a higher percentage of undecided voters. I know a handful of voters that still aren't sure.
Denny Deaton   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
34) Bot,

McCain does not support equal pay for women? News to me.

I would like more information on his tax plans. The only reference I found regarding taxes showed me that I personally would be better off under McCain

Here is a quick review of some of the misconceptions about the different tax plans. What is interesting is that as you scroll down you can see a chart put together by the Tax Policy Center. One can then determine for yourself under whose plan you will be better off.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/taxes.asp
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
_DELETED_hayley
35) Hmm. Debate on my birthday at my brother in law's alma mater --- birthday trip?
Hayley   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
36) !- I think your polls are of registered voters, not likely voters. Still, admittedly, the poll I have cited is a bit of an outlier. For whatever reason, likely voters tend to lean more Republican.

"Likely voters" are a "scientific" estimation of those people who will actually go to the polls. Lots of people have opinions, but it's sad how few will actually get off work, skip the restaurant, get up 20 minutes earlier, what have you- and ACTUALLY vote. It has proven more accurate than registered voting polls. they ask questions like, "Did you vote 4 years ago?" They might even ask if you've voted in "off-year" elections. That seems like a helpful barometer to me, though still a tad imprecise.


Dave- you know I genuinely like you, and this is not a hostile conversation for me. It's fun more than anything, and maybe one day, one of us will convince the other of something politically :) Last word: you have grossly mis-stated my position on black voters, as I explained in a previous blog. I'm not your stereotypical Republican leaner.
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
37) Allow me also to say this- we really need a candidate to win 350+ EV, at least a semi-landslide. We need someone who has enough sense of authority to get things done. That was what made Reagan successful, in part, IMHO. I mean that for either Obama or McCain. This country would not benefit from another close election. Someone needs to emerge as the clear winner.
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
38) Make sure you are somewhere you're allowed to laugh when you watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TiQCJXpbKg

(something all of us will enjoy)
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
spike
39) Yeah that is fun! I like this one too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAQDGnwBNa8
Spike   Monday, September 8, 2008
ppike
40) Are there any polls of likely voters who don't answer their phones (with the help of caller ID)? I wonder how much that affects polls these days. Mark, do you know?
pegi   Monday, September 8, 2008
daveheinzel
41) Nice videos, Brian and Spike. I saw that Daily Show comparison video too. Unfortunately though, you could just as easily make one like that comparing Bush/Obama. Not that I think they're alike, but the parts from the speeches the Daily Show used are similar to things Obama has said as well. But I do like the Bush/McCain comparison :)
Dave Heinzel   Monday, September 8, 2008
ppike
42) Re: the video - thanks, Brian, that was fun.
pegi   Monday, September 8, 2008
nheinzel
43) Yes, thanks Spike and Brian, for those hilarious videos!!!
!   Monday, September 8, 2008
nheinzel
44) Brian, that was just my point earlier.....I don't think either candidate will emerge as a clear winner because I think this country's pretty much 50/50 red/blue (see the Gore/Bush election). I predict a close election....God forbid.
!   Monday, September 8, 2008
BrianHamrick
45) New poll out of Michigan:

Obama 47%, McCain 46%

This is a must have for Obama.
Brian   Monday, September 8, 2008
mattpike
46) http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/

This is an average of polls that shows all of the major ones and is updated every few days. I have no idea how these things can be accurate. How many of you are on the do not call list? I don't even have a home phone, so I haven't been polled in years.
mattpike   Monday, September 8, 2008
hawkwolf
47) The obama spurt came at the wrong time, and it was dealt another blow today, when Hil said that she wasn't going to attack McCain-Palin. There too many people in the US that identify with the causes that McCain Pailin are bringing out. I have heard enough about what obama claims to know that it is nothing more than more taxes, welfare, and wasteful spending. Today, there looms a great threat close to our shores with the announcement that Russia is going to hold Naval Exercises with Venezuela. Also, when I read that the Iranians are hoping obama wins because it gives a better chance to get their view point across in the US.
obama is an appeaser, while MCCain is a Pro Actor and will not hesitate to protect our country. All of young marrieds with children should think that if it comes to it, your husband may have to be drafted to protected to protect this country. I know alot of you come from the post Vietnam Era, but the draft is not beyond reality. Also, I know that there are many former draft dodgers on this board, but just think your children will probably get a chance to serve.
BeanCounter37   Monday, September 8, 2008
rangywulf
48) what the hell? Have you ever heard the term proof read?

How do you "know" there are draft dodgers on this board? Did they confess to you?

i think we agree for once...McCain is like every other politician and is a Professional Actor...He should star in his own movies...
RW   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
49) Matt

Politicians are exempt from the do not call list. Funny how they snuck that in there.
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
mattpike
50) 'Also, I know that there are many former draft dodgers on this board, but just think your children will probably get a chance to serve.'

Beanotron 4000-
If there are any, which I don't think there are, then they just have another reason to vote for Obama. Keeping us out of conflict is what keeps the draft away. If you tell someone that they're an asshole and a terrorist 10 times a day for years, would you expect a fight? You should, because you would deserve it. Get it? What happened to the republicans that just wanted to make money and stay out of everybody's business?
mattpike   Monday, September 8, 2008
RickMonday
51) Matt,

Hey, I agree with your comment "What happened to the republicans that just wanted to make money and stay out of everybody's business?"

If you find any politician who thinks that way let me know.
RickMonday   Monday, September 8, 2008
mattpike
52) Maybe Ron Paul?
mattpike   Tuesday, September 9, 2008
BrianHamrick
53) Yeah, Ron Paul fits that bill. And maybe Dr. No?

O'Reilly was a trainwreck last night. He kept interrupting Obama, being sarcastic with his criticisms (some of which were false), and Obama had to fight him just to finish explaining his points. I am one of those who think Bill is normally a no spin guy, but not last night. He crossed the line between a tough interview and being downright annoying. And then he went on to brag about how he "let Obama talk," and how "I only had 30 minutes to cram it all in." Kudos to Obama for not going all Bill Clinton on him (think the Chris Wallace interview), he was very patient.

Tonight, O'Reilly grills him on Rev. Wright, Tony Rezko, and William Ayers. He promises it will be even more lively.
Brian   Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Leave a Comment


Your Name
Enter the text from the left:
Publish Comment