Sunday, June 1st, 2008
In the year 2008

Since we are in the graduation season, I've heard my share of speeches lately. I'm sure you've heard these before. "Graduation is not an ending, it's a new beginning." Those sort of public comments. Anyway, I've heard a couple variations on the date. Not June 1, but 2008.

The turn of the century has created a new dilemma, how we refer to the year. When I was younger, the Cubs won the National League Eastern Division title in nineteen eighty-four, not one-thousand nine-hundred eighty-four. Yet, this weekend I heard 2008 referred to two different ways, two-thousand eight and twenty oh-eight.

Is there a proper way? Do you have a preference?
Tags:  time
12 Comments
Scott
1) I believe "two thousand eight" is the more popular phrase. I think people just got used to saying it as such in the year 2000 (two thousand, of course, not twenty-oh-zero).

Besides, if we ignored the fact that we're referring to years, it's perfectly fine to refer to 1800 as "eighteen hundred" but a bit awkward to refer to 2000 as "twenty hundred".
Scott   Sunday, June 1, 2008
George
2) "Two thousand AND eight" is my preferred style.
LimeyGeorge   Sunday, June 1, 2008
daveheinzel
3) I'm with George. Gotta put in the "and" just in case.
Dave Heinzel   Sunday, June 1, 2008
courtneyheinzel
4) I like to say "two thousand n eight." That 'n' sounds just sort of halfway rolls out after the "nd" in thousand. It probably sounds more like "two thousand nate."

I would like to boycott these confusing years. I vote for returning to a teen numbered year.
Courtney Heinzel   Sunday, June 1, 2008
George
5) Good call; we need to devalue the century. How do we do that? Any economonisomists in the vicinity?
LimeyGeorge   Monday, June 2, 2008
betsyradish
6) I am with Courtney. I think I say "two-thousan-eight."

I think "twenty-oh-eight" is a bit much.
Betsy   Monday, June 2, 2008
_DELETED_hayley
7) oh 8. If to be correct, we would all say zero eight.

But I think this happened because it's just the way the number system works - we say nine hundred, then one thousand, then eleven hundred (because we are lazy and take the shortest route from start to finish).

So in that vein, we said nineteen hundred. not one thousand nine hundred. And when it become 2010 and its easier for everyone to say "twenty ten", of course we'll do that instead of two thousand and ten. But for now "twenty zero eight" doesn't quite roll off the tongue. Give it a year and a half, and everyone will just say "twenty ten"

as for me, I graduated in two thousand two, two thousand six, and two thousand eight.

was that long winded?
hayley   Monday, June 2, 2008
billpearch
8) Nope, not long-winded.
Bill   Monday, June 2, 2008
lgrant
9) Funny how it took 8 years to be a problem--why didn't 2001 have the same dilemma? Someone probably had the same argument back when it was 1008 AD and they couldn't decide whether to call it 1000-8 or 10-08. :)
LGrant   Monday, June 2, 2008
Leslie
10) Two thousand eight is what I use. I don't use the AND. It feels funny even to say it that way.
Leslie   Monday, June 2, 2008
stevenheinzel
11) No "and".
stheinz   Monday, June 2, 2008
George
12) Courtney, I like "two thousand nate," it sounds like a comic book hero. I think you should start that and market it.
LimeyGeorge   Monday, June 2, 2008
Leave a Comment


Your Name
Enter the text from the left:
Publish Comment