Friday, September 12th, 2008
A Political Blog
So many thoughts going through head...don't know where to start...don't have time to type all thoughts...HELP!!!
NCLB was bipartisan and it wasn't Bush's idea. It was Ted Kennedy's. Also, it's the state's responsibility to determine what is deemed "proficient", not the federal government. This is why kids in Kansas have more "proficient" and "above proficient" than Missouri, Kansas' standards are lower than Missouri's.
Vouchers are a VERY bad idea. My wife has taught in both the public and private sector and can tell you that it's not the schools, it's the home life of the students. Would you give a damn about your times tables if you weren't sure there was going to be food on the table after school? Our basic needs have to be met before anyone will ever care about education. Please read Ruby Payne's book, "A Framework for Understanding Poverty." It's an eye-opener.
The concept of NCLB is a good one, just poorly executed. We have both the Republicans and Democrats to thank for that. What have either parties done to ensure the success of the law? We do need to get rid of crappy teachers, but that's easier said than done. We need more good teachers and to have that happen, more money is needed to entice people who would rather be the Michael Scott's of the world because they can make more money being the regional manager of Dundler Mifflin.
Lastly, BeanCounter, I don't know where to even start. I didn't take one AP class, I have HS students who didn't take any AP classes and yet, I was able to go to a 4 year university that cost $100,000 to attend, but because of scholarships (academic and music) I only had to pay $5,000 off in student loans. Please do what I tell my students to do when they are writing a letter, EDIT.
I'm sure they'll be more, but these political blogs are getting a little out of control. Do you realize that pretty much everything that is written in the comment section has already been said? I'm hoping that I can get more than my standard 3 comments on this entry.
A Political Blog
So many thoughts going through head...don't know where to start...don't have time to type all thoughts...HELP!!!
NCLB was bipartisan and it wasn't Bush's idea. It was Ted Kennedy's. Also, it's the state's responsibility to determine what is deemed "proficient", not the federal government. This is why kids in Kansas have more "proficient" and "above proficient" than Missouri, Kansas' standards are lower than Missouri's.
Vouchers are a VERY bad idea. My wife has taught in both the public and private sector and can tell you that it's not the schools, it's the home life of the students. Would you give a damn about your times tables if you weren't sure there was going to be food on the table after school? Our basic needs have to be met before anyone will ever care about education. Please read Ruby Payne's book, "A Framework for Understanding Poverty." It's an eye-opener.
The concept of NCLB is a good one, just poorly executed. We have both the Republicans and Democrats to thank for that. What have either parties done to ensure the success of the law? We do need to get rid of crappy teachers, but that's easier said than done. We need more good teachers and to have that happen, more money is needed to entice people who would rather be the Michael Scott's of the world because they can make more money being the regional manager of Dundler Mifflin.
Lastly, BeanCounter, I don't know where to even start. I didn't take one AP class, I have HS students who didn't take any AP classes and yet, I was able to go to a 4 year university that cost $100,000 to attend, but because of scholarships (academic and music) I only had to pay $5,000 off in student loans. Please do what I tell my students to do when they are writing a letter, EDIT.
I'm sure they'll be more, but these political blogs are getting a little out of control. Do you realize that pretty much everything that is written in the comment section has already been said? I'm hoping that I can get more than my standard 3 comments on this entry.
I see too many children go home from school, say they have no homework (hell, some don't even have a book bag) and know they can get away with it because the parents just don't care. Teachers are not meant to be babysitters, they are there to help our children learn. No voucher program is going to do anything to change that. The changes need to be made at HOME!
One of the characteristics of poverty is that those who are poor can't see a way out; they can't realistically dream about a better life than the one they're living. And so the cycle keeps repeating itself....over and over and over.
What's the answer? In my opinion, education....but then you get into the problems stated above. I think things are improving, very little by very little. And I think having a black President would be a wonderful role model for thousands of kids living in poverty. If he can, maybe I can too.
I think NCLB meant well. At least somebody tried to do SOMETHING instead of the same old, same old. But the standards are all too subjective. As you said, two states can have different standards. Then where are we? We've heard of teachers cheating to improve their students' scores; we've heard of "teaching to the test" where it seems that all teachers worry about and try to teach is what is going to be on the next test. In Springfield this year all three high school principals were replaced in order to improve students' scores. I don't think that's all bad. Now they need to shake up the teaching assignments so that the "cliques" are broken up and the three high schools receive a similar education.
But as long as poverty exists, as long as thousands of kids don't have the motivation to succeed or even the will to get to school every day and do the work required of them, then NCLB will not succeed.
I'm curious about your (and anyone elses) thoughts on what some of the Chicago public schools have decided to do--pay their students for every A ($50), B ($35) and C ($20) they get on their report cards. More details on the programs:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/content/educatio...
First off, NCLB was great in thought, but in practice, it clearly doesn't work for multiple reasons. Illinois is implementing a new program called RtI. It makes teachers and schools accountable to individual students. It looks at individual student success based on both academics and behaviors and requires schools to look at students who aren't succeeding and try to find out why. I don't think it will be the savior of education, but we're getting better.
I couldn't agree with you more about the importance of parental involvement. I don't work in a private school, but our students, for the most part, are very successful, and it's because we have very strong parental involvement.
I would like to see teachers held more accountable, as it frustrates me to no end to see fellow teachers not doing their jobs. I have no solution on how to do this; however, teachers are just as frustrated with bad teachers as anyone.
In St. Louis, there is a VTS program (Voluntary Transfer Students) where we take students from the city into the county schools. I commend the parents for taking the effort to get their child into a county school, but unfortunately, most of them don't have the resources to participate in their child's education in our district beyond that. We even provide cab service for conferences, and we also hold events in their neighborhoods, but we just don't see much of those families.
I wish that I could say that our low socio-economic city kids could break the cycle of poverty, but unfortunately, most of them do not. They have so much going against them.
I am very lucky that I work in a district where 99% of the district staff is extremely high quality. Where I taught in Chicago, I couldn't say the same thing. A lot of the teachers are just going through the motions to get paid.
As far as paying kids for grades, I'm pretty opposed to using extrinsic motivation to get kids to learn. Although, I can see where this will motivate urban kids to try a little harder. I'll be curious to hear about how successful it really is. Unfortunately for city kids, they are up against a lot more than middle class families never experience. Most of my city kids are responsible for themselves, and their homes are pretty chaotic after school. Many of them are parents to their younger siblings, share a room with multiple people, stay up late because it is impossible to get to bed at a reasonable hour because of noise, lack nutrition, parents don't have enough education to help with homework, etc . . .
My dad was a principal in the Rockwood SD at Marquette HS and had a program where the district bussed in inner-city students to his school. However, my dad said that those kids did not take advantage of the opportunities given them. It just shows that it doesn't what the facilities are, it's something deeper. I have a unique opportunity to teach in an inner-city/suburban school district in south Kansas City. I am a positive role model for my students and I can show them where they could be with some hard work and dedication. I love my school and my job!
Earning a scholarship is not the same as getting paid for grades.
What's wrong with a community college? That's where I started out, not because I had to, but because I wanted to. Many students do. It's a money issue or a family issue. So many graduating seniors are terrified to start this next phase of their lives, so they put it off by going to a community college. Many of them learn study skills and figure out what they want to do without spending tens of thousands a year. It seems practical to me. But you blast them for it?
I personally think an educated person is one who can write and speak the language that s/he grew up with fluently. It's a person who knows how to censor him/herself with regards to opinions which are different from the majority and opinions that might offend. It's someone who has chosen to take advantage of all opportunities with regards to learning, but it might not include college.
Who's the elitist?